The online food delivery system allows customers to order and receive desired food products at their doorstep. Change in lifestyle and eating habits, stringent work schedule, and increase in the number of working women, and rise in disposable income drive the online food delivery market. Some of the key players are Zomato, Swiggy, Domino’s Pizza, Fasoos, and Box8.

Market insights:
The market is expected to reach INR 1,515.17 Bn by 2026 expanding at a CAGR of 30.11% during the 2021 – 2026 period. Rapid digitalization and acceptance of online food delivery services among consumers across tier I and tier II cities propel market growth.

However, low-cost food and retail products offered by local unorganized players in tier II and tier II cities, and villages is expected to restrict the development of the organized players. There has been a consistent rise in investments received by established industry players such as Zomato and Swiggy in the online food aggregators market in India.

COVID-19 impact analysis:
The nationwide lockdown induced by the COVID-19 pandemic initially caused some disruptions in the growth of the online food delivery market. However, it bounced back, owing to people’s inclination toward takeaways over dine-outs in order to comply with social distancing norms.

Although the number of online orders went up this year, sales declined in the second quarter due to the second wave. In April, overall online food delivery sales dropped by almost 40% to (provide April figure) from (provide figure) in March.

This was because of apprehension toward food from outside. However, the pandemic has also resulted in the onboarding of new customers. Due to social distancing norms, there has been an aggressive shift toward delivery-oriented infrastructure as customers preferred ordering food at home over dining out.

Related reports: 

Online Food Delivery Market in India 2020

The post Online Food Delivery System Market in India 2021 first appeared on CRI Report.

Market insights:
The PoS terminal market in India was valued at INR 27.47 Bn in 2020. It is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of ~13.29% between 2021 and 2025. It may reach a value of INR 50.01 Bn by 2025. The increase in the usage of near-field communicative devices, preference for contactless payment, and demand for e-commerce activities might influence the growth of the India PoS terminal market. Expansion of the market can also be attributed to the initiatives undertaken by the Government of India (GoI) to promote digital payment and thus cashless economy in the country. Some of such policies implemented by the government include demonetization, Jan Dhan Yojana, and the establishment of micro ATMs nationally. Moreover, technological advancements and the increasing adoption of new technologies, such as e-wallets and mobile wallets are also leading to a revolution in the market. However, the lack of the availability of adequate PoS terminals in the market hinders the further market growth. Alongside, high installation charges and maintenance costs, as well as security concerns regarding theft disrupt the stable growth in the market. Some of the prominent players operating in the market are ePaisa Services Private Limited, Ezetap Mobile Solutions Private Limited, and MobiSwipe Technologies Private Limited.

COVID-19 impact analysis:
The pandemic, followed by a long-term nationwide lockdown, had an adverse impact on the PoS terminal market in India. In the short run, the PoS terminal market in India experienced a downfall in its market value. The primary reasons behind market disruption were the closure of retail stores for a considerable duration and the existing financial stress in the market, which led to a fall in people’s purchasing power. Implementing stringent import restrictions caused a shortage in the supply of new PoS machines. They were essential since retail units were shifting to contactless methods of payment. Old and faulty devices were being removed or replaced. However, at present, due to the fear of social contacting and gathering, people are preferring cashless and contactless methods of payment. With the growing market for digital payments over the coming years, the PoS terminal market in India is also likely to expand multifold.

Companies covered
• ePaisa Services Private Limited
• Ezetap Mobile Solutions Private Limited
• MobiSwipe Technologies Private Limited
• Mswipe Technologies Private Limited
• Pine Labs Finance Private Limited
• Ingenico International India Private Limited
• PAX Technologies Private Limited
• PayU Payments Private Limited
• Verifone India Sales Private Limited

The post Point of Sale Terminal Market in India 2021 first appeared on CRI Report.

Market insights:
Rise in the incidence of skin diseases and improved awareness regarding skin health among people are a few of the significant factors that propel market growth. Furthermore, easy accessibility of these products through company websites and online channels, and doorstep delivery are driving the market. However, high price points of branded skin care products and the presence of counterfeit ones deter its growth.

Segment insights:

The skin care products market in India is categorized into into face, body, sun, and other skin care products segments. In terms of revenue, the face care products dominated the market, accounting for 57.22% share in 2020. The other skin care products segment, which includes depilatory products for face and body, is expected to grow at the fastest CAGR of ~10.13% during the 2021 – 2025 period.

COVID-19 impact analysis:
The nationwide lockdown imposed in the wake of the pandemic had severely impacted the supply chain and manufacturing activities of the market. The demand for skin care products declined drastically during the lockdown due to closure of stores, supermarkets, parlors, and salons. However, the sales volume of home skin care kits picked up after the withdrawal of the first phase of the lockdown. The market became stable gradually as skin care distribution channels including stores, spas, parlors, and salons resumed operations.

Companies covered:
• Emami Limited
• Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health care Limited
• Amway India Enterprises Private Limited
• Lotus Herbals Private Limited
• Nykaa E-retail Private Limited
• The Himalaya Drug Company
• Johnson & Johnson Private Limited
• L’Oreal India Private Limited
• Nivea India Private Limited

The post Skin Care Market in India 2020 first appeared on CRI Report.

Market insights:

As of 2019, the polycarbonate resin market in India was valued at INR 24.75 Bn, and is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of ~9% during the 2020-2025 period, to reach INR 40.76 Bn by 2025. In 2019, India accounted for ~2.05% of the global polycarbonate resin market revenue. Government initiatives to develop commercial and industrial roofing in India, and the cost-effective nature of PC resin are some of the significant factors expected to bolster market growth. India does not account for any domestic production of polycarbonate resin. Therefore, the country’s dependency on imports to meet its domestic demand is restraining the growth of the market. Presence of toxic chemicals in polycarbonate resins cause environmental and health hazards in case of exposure and this, in turn, restrains the growing usage of these chemicals.

COVID-19 impact analysis:

The outbreak of the contagion, followed by a long-term nationwide lockdown decelerated the growth momentum of the overall polycarbonate resin market in India. Polycarbonate resin is a significant raw material used in the production of input components by the country’s end-use industries. Therefore, the impact of COVID-19 on these related industries mark a proportional impact on the polycarbonate resin market in India. During this crisis period, the end-use industries like the automotive, construction, appliances, and sports safety equipment experienced halt in their potential production cycle, imparting a negative impact on the demand for polycarbonate resins as well. On the other hand, the polycarbonate resin market witnessed a sharp rise in demand as an input chemical from the industries like medical devices and equipment, electronics and electricals at the same time.

Competitive analysis:

In India, the polycarbonate resin market is dominated by foreign subsidiaries like Covestro (India) Private Limited, SABIC Innovative Plastics India Private Limited, and Teijin India Private Limited. Around 60% of the country’s total demand for polycarbonate resin end-products is sustained by Covestro India and SABIC Innovative Plastics cumulatively. Other players in the market include MG Polyplast Industries Private Limited, Power Chem Plast Limited, Samsung SDI India Private Limited, and Tuflite Polymers Limited. India is expected to have its first local polycarbonate resin manufacturing plant set up by 2023, by GAIL Limited.

Companies covered:

• Lotus Roofings Private Limited
• MG Polyplast Industries Private Limited
• Power Chem Plast Limited
• Tuflite Polymers Limited
• Covestro (India) Private Limited
• SABIC Innovative Plastics India Private Limited
• Samsung SDI India Private Limited
• Teijin India Private Limited

The post Polycarbonate Resin Market in India 2020 first appeared on CRI Report.

The online food delivery market in India is growing in tandem with evolving lifestyle patterns and eating habits of Indians. Hectic work schedules and rise in disposable incomes have popularized food delivery, especially in urban areas.

The online food delivery market in India is expected to expand at compound annual growth rates of ~30.55% (based on revenue) and ~10.19% (based on the number of users) during the 2020-2024 period, to generate a revenue of INR ~1,334.99 Bn and develop a user base of ~300.57 Mn by 2024.

Major players currently operating in the Indian online food delivery market include platform-to-customer service providers like Swiggy (Bundl Technologies Private Limited), FreshMenu (FoodVista India Private Limited), Faasos (Rebel Foods Private Limited) and Zomato (Zomato Media Private Limited). Apart from these, there exist certain companies that operate with a restaurant-to-customer delivery model like Box8, Domino’s (Domino’s Pizza, Inc.), and KFC (Yum! Brands, Inc.).

Segment-wise market overview
As of 2019, millennials accounted for ~63% of the overall user base of the online food delivery market. This is owed to increasing disposable income of the millennials, especially in the urban regions in India. Also, millennials prefer ordering food online since it is easy to handle and saves time and energy of cooking at home.

In 2019, out of the major online food delivery service providers, Zomato held a share of ~38% in terms of user base. Swiggy held a share of ~27% in the online food delivery user base of India in 2019. High adoption rates in tier I and tier II cities, as well as swift delivery services has helped these two companies to gain the high share in the Indian market.

Key growth driver of the market
In the recent years, the number of working women has increased in the Indian workforce, especially in the city-based organized sectors. As a result, the number of double income families in also on the rise. With both the partners working and maintaining hectic working schedules, it become difficult for people to get time and energy to cook at home. Moreover, the dual income scenario has increased the overall spending capacity of the families. Also, the key players like Swiggy, and Zomato keep on announcing lucrative offers for the customers, both existing and new, in order to keep up the stiff competition in the online food ordering market. This in turn is leading towards people’s preference towards ordering food online and enjoying their favourite cuisine at home at an affordable price, thereby increasing the overall value and user base of the online food ordering market in India.

Key deterrent to the growth of the market
Recently, there have been several instances of spurious and closed restaurants; and food shops taking orders on food platforms, only to be informed later that either the shop cannot be located or had shut operations. Cases were reported where certain outlets registered on these food delivery apps have turned out to be makeshift, or operate out of home joints, with hardly any focus on hygiene and quality. This has caused annoyance among both the customers and the food delivery executives. Also, consumers are becoming concerned about the quality of food since such unauthorized food stalls seldom maintain hygiene both while cooking and packaging. This, in turn, is developing dissatisfaction among the customers of the online food delivery market in India.

Companies covered
• Box8
• Bundl Technologies Private Limited
• FoodVista India Private Limited
• Rebel Foods Private Limited
• Zomato Media Private Limited
• Domino’s Pizza, Inc.
• Yum! Brands, Inc.

Online Food Delivery Market in India 2020

The post Online Food Delivery Market in India 2020 first appeared on CRI Report.

The post Activewear Market in India 2019 first appeared on CRI Report.

DC description
Ø glycerol
Ø glycol
Ø glycerine in personal care
Ø glycerine food
Ø Triglyceride

1 Report Prologue
2 Market Introduction
2.1 Definition
2.1.1 Scope of the Study
2.1.2 Research Objectives
2.1.3 Assumptions
2.1.4 Limitations
2.2 Markets Structure
3 Research Methodology
3.1 Research Process
3.2 Primary Research
3.3 Secondary Research
3.4 Market Size Estimation
3.5 Forecast Model
4 Market Dynamics
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Growth Drivers
4.2.1 Increasing industrial application accelerate demand
4.2.2 Increasing population accelerate demand
4.3 Restraints
4.3.1 Production and Consumption Gap
4.3.2 Price fluctuation of biodiesel
4.4 Trends
4.4.1 Capacity expansion by major players
4.4.2 New Entrants focusing on refining of glycerine
4.5 Opportunities
4.5.1 Emerging applications of glycerine in medical and defence, resins, energy and oilfield creating new opportunities for the manufacturers
5 Market Factor Analysis
5.1 Supply Chain Analysis
5.1.1 Raw Material Suppliers
5.1.2 Mexico Glycerine Producers
5.1.3 Mexico Glycerine Market Traders
5.1.4 Mexico Glycerine Market End Users
5.2 Porter’s 5 Force Analysis
5.2.1 Threat of New Entrants
5.2.2 Threat of Rivalry
5.2.3 Threat of Substitute
5.2.4 Bargaining Power of Supplier
5.2.5 Bargaining Power of Buyer
6 Mexico Glycerine Market, By Source
6.1 Introduction
7 Mexico Glycerine Market, By Grade
7.1 Introduction
8 Mexico Glycerine Market, By Application
8.1 Introduction
9 Mexico Glycerine Market, By Region
9.1 Introduction
10 Competitive Landscape
10.1 Introduction: Key Players
10.1.1 Mexico Glycerine Production Market
10.2 Market Share Analysis
10.2.1 Mexico Glycerine Traders
11 Company Profiles
11.1 Cargill Incorporated
11.1.1 Company Overview
11.1.2 Product/Business Segment Overview
11.1.3 Financial Overview
11.1.4 Key Development
11.2 Kao corporation
11.2.1 Company Overview
11.2.2 Product/Business Segment Overview
11.2.3 Financial Updates
11.3 QUIMIC SA de CV
11.3.1 Company Overview
11.3.2 Product/Business Segment Overview
11.3.3 Financial Updates
11.4 Quimica Delta
11.4.1 Company Overview
11.4.2 Product/Business Segment Overview
11.4.3 Financial Updates
11.5 Oxiteno Mexico, S.A de C.V
11.5.1 Company Overview
11.5.2 Product/Business Segment Overview
11.5.3 Financial Updates
11.6 PEMEX
11.6.1 Company Overview
11.6.2 Product/Business Segment Overview
11.6.3 Financial Updates
12 Conclusion

The post Mexico Glycerine Market Research Report – Forecast to 2023 first appeared on CRI Report.

1 Report Prologue
2 Introduction
2.1 Definition
2.2 Scope of the Study
2.2.1 Research Methodology
2.2.2 Assumptions
2.3 Limitations
2.4 Market Structure
3 Research Methodology
3.1 Research Process
3.2 Primary Research
3.3 Secondary Research
4 Market Dynamics
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Drivers
4.2.1 Rising Launch of New Concepts by Key Manufacturers
4.2.2 Larger Patient Base
4.3 Restraints
4.3.1 Stringent Regulatory Guidelines for the Use of the Drugs
4.4 Mega Trends
4.4.1 Development of New Technology for the Treatment of Disease
4.4.2 Macroeconomic Indicators
5 Market Factor Analysis
5.1 Value Chain Analysis
6 Stages of Clinical Trials
6.1 Preclinical Trial
6.2 Phase I Clinical Trial
6.3 Phase II Clinical Trial
6.4 Phase III Clinical Trial
6.5 Phase IV Clinical Trial
7 Interleukin 10 Pipeline Product Analysis, By Product
7.1 AM-0010
7.1.1 Product Description
7.1.2 Mechanism of Action
7.1.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.2 ANV-103
7.2.1 Product Description
7.2.2 Mechanism of Action
7.2.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.3 AS-101
7.3.1 Product Description
7.3.2 Mechanism of Action
7.3.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.4 BT-063
7.4.1 Product Description
7.4.2 Mechanism of Action
7.4.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.5 DEKAVIL/F8 IL10
7.5.1 Product Description
7.5.2 Mechanism of Action
7.5.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.6 EG-12
7.6.1 Product Description
7.6.2 Mechanism of Action
7.6.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.7 LEO-32731
7.7.1 Product Description
7.7.2 Mechanism of Action
7.7.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.8 MK-1966
7.8.1 Product Description
7.8.2 Mechanism of Action
7.8.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.9 PD-2244
7.9.1 Product Description
7.9.2 Mechanism of Action
7.9.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.10 XT-101
7.10.1 Product Description
7.10.2 Mechanism of Action
7.10.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.11 XT-150
7.11.1 Product Description
7.11.2 Mechanism of Action
7.11.3 Clinical Trial Progress
7.12 Gene Therapy to Activate Interleukin 10 for Atherosclerosis
7.12.1 Product Description
7.12.2 Clinical Trial Progress
7.13 Gene Therapy to Activate Interleukin-10 for ALS
7.13.1 Clinical Trial Progress
7.14 Biologic to Activate Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase and IL-10 for Type 1 Diabetes
7.14.1 Clinical Trial Progress
7.15 Biologic to Target Gluten and IL-10 for Celiac Disease
7.15.1 Clinical Trial Progress
7.16 Cell Therapy to Activate IL-10 for Autoimmune Myocarditis and Inflammation
7.16.1 Clinical Trial Progress
7.17 Synthetic Peptides to Inhibit IL-10 and IFN Gamma for Cancer, Viral Infections and Inflammatory Diseases
7.17.1 Clinical Trial Progress
8 Competitive Landscape
8.1 Acquisitions & Partnership
8.1.1 Pfizer Acquire Anacor
8.1.2 Merck Aquire IOmet
8.1.3 Takeda and EnGene Establish Strategic Alliance
9 Company Profile
9.1 Pfizer Inc.
9.1.1 Overview
9.1.2 Product Overview
9.1.3 Financials
9.1.4 Key Developments
9.2 Merck & Co., Inc.
9.2.1 Overview
9.2.2 Product Overview
9.2.3 Financials
9.2.4 Key Developments
9.3 Biotest AG
9.3.1 Overview
9.3.2 Product Overview
9.3.3 Financials
9.3.4 Key Developments
9.4 BioMAS Ltd.
9.4.1 Overview
9.4.2 Product Overview
9.4.3 Financials
9.4.4 Key Developments
9.5 EnGene Inc.
9.5.1 Overview
9.5.2 Product Overview
9.5.3 Financials
9.5.4 Key Developments
9.6 Leo Pharma
9.6.1 Overview
9.6.2 Product Overview
9.6.3 Financials
9.6.3 Financials
9.6.4 Key Developments
9.7 Anvil Biosciences
9.7.1 Overview
9.7.2 Product Overview
9.7.3 Financials
9.7.4 Key Developments
9.8 Intrexon Corporation
9.8.1 Overview
9.8.2 Product Overview
9.8.3 Financials
9.8.4 Key Developments
9.9 P2D Biosciences
9.9.1 Overview
9.9.2 Product Overview
9.9.3 Financials
9.9.4 Key Developments
9.10 Xalud Therapeutics INC.
9.10.1 Overview
9.10.2 Product Overview
9.10.3 Financials
9.10.4 Key Developments

The post Global Interleukin 10 Pipeline Product Analysis Review Market Analysis first appeared on CRI Report.